Page 3 of 3
 What is Received Pronunciation?
What is Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English?
Is there such a thing as 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English'?
Received Pronunciation and Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English
by Dr Catherine Sangster Is there such a thing as Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English?
The Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ doesn't require any of its broadcasters to speak with any particular accent. It could be argued that, even in those early years before the Second World War, the fact that the announcers and newsreaders heard on the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ spoke RP was a by-product of the restricted social group from which Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ employees was drawn, rather than a matter of deliberate policy. Nevertheless, the term 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English' entered the language and is still widely used, even though - as we can see from the comments above - a range of accents are used on the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ. The term is even being used by linguists. This maybe because, as we have seen, RP is a loaded and problematic term which conjures up many problems and prejudices. So some linguists now follow popular usage by relabelling what they used to call RP as 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English' and, in some pronunciation dictionaries, the accent represented is now called 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English' instead of RP.There's a problem with this approach, though. If you call the accent normally used in Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ news broadcasts 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English', and use that as an example of RP, then the people whom the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ employs as news broadcasters are therefore RP speakers by definition. This circularity of defining 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English' in relation to RP, and RP in relation to the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ makes 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English' meaningless as a concept. Ironically, this is happening just as the relationship between RP and so-called 'Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓƵ English' might more logically be viewed as a thing of the past.
|
