Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ

Explore the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

29 October 2014
Press Office
Search the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ and Web
Search Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ Press Office

Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµpage

Contact Us


Press Releases & Press Packs


29.07.03

ABOUT THE Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ


Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ publishes latest Programme Complaints Unit and Governors' Programme Complaints Committee findings


The Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ today publishes the latest findings of the Programme Complaints Unit (PCU) and those of the Governors' Programme Complaints Committee for the period 1 April to 30 June 2003.


In this quarter the unit dealt with a total of 645 complaints concerning 227 items.


312 complaints were upheld (23 of them partly) - 48.5% of the total number of complaints received.


Of the items investigated, complaints were upheld against 26 items - 11.5% of the total number of complaints received.


The PCU report contains summaries of the findings in those cases.


In a foreword to the PCU Bulletin Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ Director-General Greg Dyke explains that the reason for the high proportion of complaints upheld is mainly down to one item, a promotional trail for Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ ONE broadcast from 7.30pm onwards on the evening of 27 May.


He adds that: "We immediately recognised we'd made a mistake, withdrew the trail the next day, and issued a statement apologising for the upset it had caused."


The Governors' Programme Complaints Committee (GPCC) takes appeals from complainants who are not happy with the response they have received from Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ Management.


It also published its findings for the same period.


It came to a decision on seven appeals in this quarter, five of which raised matters of fairness and accuracy and two of which concerned matters of taste and decency.


Of these, it upheld one appeal in full and one in part.


In a foreword to the bulletin, Chairman of the Governors' Programme Complaints Committee, Sir Robert Smith, commented: "In these three months, the Committee was particularly concerned with issues of impartiality in Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ News coverage, which also reflects monitoring by the full Board of Governors to ensure that the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ complies with its Charter obligations.


"As the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ Producers' Guidelines state, impartiality is a core value which lies at the heart of the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ, and no programming is exempt from it.


"Overall, the Committee has concluded in a range of appeals that such requirements have been met by the programming under scrutiny."


Notes to Editors


Both bulletins can be found at


The Programme Complaints Unit deals with letters of complaint which give reason to believe that something broadcast by the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ's licence fee-funded services may have fallen seriously short of the standards set out in the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ Producers' Guidelines.


Complaints about other matters, such as policy, changes to the published schedule, technical standards or questions of personal preference, are forwarded to the appropriate areas of the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ for attention.


The unit is commissioned to investigate complaints impartially and to recommend appropriate redress.


Generally this involves viewing or listening to a recording of the material and pursuing the complainants' points with the programme-makers and editorial executives directly responsible.


The Governors' Programme Complaints Committee (GPCC) consists of five Governors of the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ, to whom the full Board of Governors have delegated the power to consider appeals.


The GPCC's conclusions are reported to the full Board.


It is the specific function of the GPCC to consider appeals against decisions and actions of the Programme Complaints Unit or of the Directors of Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ Divisions in dealing with serious editorial complaints.


The GPCC considers appeals in relation to complaints about programmes transmitted, or material carried, by the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ's domestic public services on radio, television and online, and which allege:


• that the complainant has suffered unfair treatment in a transmitted item


• that the complainant's privacy has been unjustifiably infringed, either in a programme or item as transmitted or in the process of making the programme or item, or


• that there has otherwise been a failure adequately to observe the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ's editorial guidelines.


BACK TO THE TOP

PRINTABLE VERSION




About the Ä¢¹½¶ÌÊÓÆµ | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy
Ìý